The Case Against Indeed's Frustrating Job Recommendations - forums
Webindeed, a website focused on matching job seekers and employers, and other defendants were sued friday in georgia northern district court over alleged employment discrimination.
Webif an employee instead wants $15, $20, $25, etc.
Webindeed's recommendation engine is crap.
Websome companies discriminated against black applicants much more than others, and h. r.
The employer basically just says nope!, denies the application, and then turns around and says we can't find.
Instead, they see a personalized feed of job recommendations.
Webprofessionals who have accepted a job offer and soon regretted it blame their employers for misrepresenting the job during the application and interview process.
Francesca gino and colleagues investigate.
Practices made a big difference.
🔗 Related Articles You Might Like:
Discover How To Convert 300 KMH To MPH – The Full Guide!: The Shocking Truth Everyone Needs To Know! The Child As Pawn: A Custody Battle That Exploits A Child's Emotions You Won't Believe This: Decatur School Bans Controversial Book, Parents OutragedWebthe court determined that violating the terms of service of a website does not constitute a cfaa violation under the “authorized access” provisions.
Webfor example, when job seekers visit indeed’s home page, they no longer have to search for a job.
Webwhy do businesses evaluate candidates solely on past job performance, failing to consider the past job's difficulty?
